After
a long and sustained campaign the unfortunate dog Lennox, allegedly a
pit bull type, was humanely put to sleep this morning.
In
defence of the decision an 'expert' declared that the dog was “...one
of the most unpredictable and dangerous dogs he had come across."
My
feeling is that
a dog, previously
a
loved pet, that
is kept
in confinement for two years might well display unpredictable
behaviour. That poor dog was bound to be traumatised and terribly unhappy with his lot. Although I am not certain that Belfast City Council handled this situation as well as they might have, there is
no doubt that they acted entirely within
the letter of the law.
Although
I
know that many dog lovers will strongly disagree with me, I believe
that
the campaign to save Lennox actually damaged Lennox's
chance of getting
back to a
normal dog's life. Just because so many thousands of people inundated
Belfast City Council with emails and petitions does not mean that the Council
can be forced to act outside the law. The law might not be fair to
dogs of that type but it remains the law. The harassment of council
employees was a disgrace and further worsened Lennox's
very slim chance of reprieve.
There is nothing simpler than dashing off an email or signing a
petition. Just because hundreds, thousands or millions of people do
so does not make a
cause just
or rightful.
There
are huge amounts of people who work to help animals of every kind and
I truly admire what they do but there are also fanatical animal
lovers who go too far. They forget that human beings are animals too
and deserve to be protected from dangerous dogs. I'm not saying that
Lennox was a dangerous dog, I'm sure he was not, but there
are people who keep and breed aggressive dogs, there
are dogs
bred
to fight
each other to
the death
and
dogs bred to
bait other animals. There
are vicious dogs that
attack humans, even sometimes killing
or maiming
children. So
there must
be laws to
protect people and other animals.
Lennox fell foul of those laws but that is not Belfast City Council's
fault. It is more the fault of those
people
who want to
breed
and train dangerous and aggressive dogs.
Should
one of my own beloved dogs be deemed dangerous and ordered to be
destroyed I would not fight it. I would not start an internet
campaign – I would be broken-hearted but I would accept it and I
would want it done quickly before the dog's spirit was broken by a
long confinement in a sterile environment.
Campaign
by all means but campaign for the right thing. Get the law changed so
that good-natured dogs that look like dangerous dogs are not put at
risk and fight
to make legislation
stronger so that dog-fighting and all baiting 'sports' are eliminated
for ever.
2 comments:
if my dog was deemed dangerous I would fight it, because the legislation behind this act is among the most ill advised that I'm aware of. One of my neighbours recently had to do that not because his dog did anything or threatened anyone, but merely because a policeman judged it to look too like a pitfall; to save it from being kept in kennels for too long the neighbour just agreed and his lovely little dog is now tattooed, muzzled and spayed, plus he now has a criminal record.
Poor Lennox, and poor owner.Hopefully some good will come of this in the shape of more awareness of the stupidity of this law.
I see where you are coming from. I'd like to see the law changed too.
Post a Comment